Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 09:55

What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Satellite Footage Captures Mysterious Structure That Looks Like Human Lips - Indian Defence Review
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What is your first experience having sex with older men?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Donald Trump says he will only pick Fed chair who cuts interest rates - Financial Times
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Why did my bipolar girlfriend split up with me?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Were you ever in love with your teacher?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sophia Bush Says She Endured “Every Kind of Abuse” on Show Due to Older Man - The Hollywood Reporter
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Yuen: When cancer struck a second time, she found ‘euphoria’ - Star Tribune
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Isaacman interested in privately funded science missions - SpaceNews